That's an interesting write-up indeed, and I'm going to be reading Hull's remarks a couple of times when I have more time this evening. A few notes, however. Much as I pointed out in the prior thread on the Campbell's, the text "discuss among its members the novels published during the year and to arrive at a consensus choice" does not seem to reflect the process described, and this is substantively misleading. Also, I'm still hoping for answers to those other administrative questions I had, if possible.