Olbermann: "Beginning of the End of America"

Makes me wish I had cable. Finally, while all the other news stations just pass on the administration's spin, a newsman dares say that the Emperor is Evil.

Olbermann addresses the Military Commissions Act in a special comment (Full Transcript):

OLBERMANN: We have lived as if in a trance.

We have lived as people in fear.

And now--our rights and our freedoms in peril--we slowly awake to learn that we have been afraid of the wrong thing.

Therefore, tonight have we truly become the inheritors of our American legacy.

For, on this first full day that the Military Commissions Act is in force, we now face what our ancestors faced, at other times of exaggerated crisis and melodramatic fear-mongering:

A government more dangerous to our liberty, than is the enemy it claims to protect us from.

We have been here before--and we have been here before led here--by men better and wiser and nobler than George W. Bush.

We have been here when President John Adams insisted that the Alien and Sedition Acts were necessary to save American lives, only to watch him use those acts to jail newspaper editors.

American newspaper editors, in American jails, for things they wrote about America.

We have been here when President Woodrow Wilson insisted that the Espionage Act was necessary to save American lives, only to watch him use that Act to prosecute 2,000 Americans, especially those he disparaged as "Hyphenated Americans," most of whom were guilty only of advocating peace in a time of war.

American public speakers, in American jails, for things they said about America.

And we have been here when President Franklin D. Roosevelt insisted that Executive Order 9066 was necessary to save American lives, only to watch him use that order to imprison and pauperize 110,000 Americans while his man in charge, General DeWitt, told Congress: "It makes no difference whether he is an American citizen--he is still a Japanese."

American citizens, in American camps, for something they neither wrote nor said nor did, but for the choices they or their ancestors had made about coming to America.

Each of these actions was undertaken for the most vital, the most urgent, the most inescapable of reasons.

And each was a betrayal of that for which the president who advocated them claimed to be fighting.

Adams and his party were swept from office, and the Alien and Sedition Acts erased.

Many of the very people Wilson silenced survived him, and one of them even ran to succeed him, and got 900,000 votes, though his presidential campaign was conducted entirely from his jail cell.

And Roosevelt's internment of the Japanese was not merely the worst blight on his record, but it would necessitate a formal apology from the government of the United States to the citizens of the United States whose lives it ruined.

The most vital, the most urgent, the most inescapable of reasons.

In times of fright, we have been only human.

We have let Roosevelt's "fear of fear itself" overtake us.

We have listened to the little voice inside that has said, "the wolf is at the door; this will be temporary; this will be precise; this too shall pass."

We have accepted that the only way to stop the terrorists is to let the government become just a little bit like the terrorists.

Just the way we once accepted that the only way to stop the Soviets was to let the government become just a little bit like the Soviets.

Or substitute the Japanese.

Or the Germans.

Or the Socialists.

Or the Anarchists.

Or the Immigrants.

Or the British.

Or the Aliens.

The most vital, the most urgent, the most inescapable of reasons.

And, always, always wrong.

"With the distance of history, the questions will be narrowed and few: Did this generation of Americans take the threat seriously, and did we do what it takes to defeat that threat?"

Wise words.

And ironic ones, Mr. Bush.

Your own, of course, yesterday, in signing the Military Commissions Act.

You spoke so much more than you know, Sir.

Sadly--of course--the distance of history will recognize that the threat this generation of Americans needed to take seriously was you.

We have a long and painful history of ignoring the prophecy attributed to Benjamin Franklin that "those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety."

But even within this history we have not before codified the poisoning of habeas corpus, that wellspring of protection from which all essential liberties flow.

You, sir, have now befouled that spring.

You, sir, have now given us chaos and called it order.

You, sir, have now imposed subjugation and called it freedom.

For the most vital, the most urgent, the most inescapable of reasons.

And -- again, Mr. Bush -- all of them, wrong.

We have handed a blank check drawn against our freedom to a man who has said it is unacceptable to compare anything this country has ever done to anything the terrorists have ever done.

We have handed a blank check drawn against our freedom to a man who has insisted again that "the United States does not torture. It's against our laws and it's against our values" and who has said it with a straight face while the pictures from Abu Ghraib Prison and the stories of Waterboarding figuratively fade in and out, around him.

We have handed a blank check drawn against our freedom to a man who may now, if he so decides, declare not merely any non-American citizens "unlawful enemy combatants" and ship them somewhere--anywhere -- but may now, if he so decides, declare you an "unlawful enemy combatant" and ship you somewhere - anywhere.

And if you think this hyperbole or hysteria, ask the newspaper editors when John Adams was president or the pacifists when Woodrow Wilson was president or the Japanese at Manzanar when Franklin Roosevelt was president.

And if you somehow think habeas corpus has not been suspended for American citizens but only for everybody else, ask yourself this: If you are pulled off the street tomorrow, and they call you an alien or an undocumented immigrant or an "unlawful enemy combatant"--exactly how are you going to convince them to give you a court hearing to prove you are not? Do you think this attorney general is going to help you?

This President now has his blank check.

He lied to get it.

He lied as he received it.

Is there any reason to even hope he has not lied about how he intends to use it nor who he intends to use it against?

"These military commissions will provide a fair trial," you told us yesterday, Mr. Bush, "in which the accused are presumed innocent, have access to an attorney and can hear all the evidence against them."

"Presumed innocent," Mr. Bush?

The very piece of paper you signed as you said that, allows for the detainees to be abused up to the point just before they sustain "serious mental and physical trauma" in the hope of getting them to incriminate themselves, and may no longer even invoke The Geneva Conventions in their own defense.

"Access to an attorney," Mr. Bush?

Lieutenant Commander Charles Swift said on this program, Sir, and to the Supreme Court, that he was only granted access to his detainee defendant on the promise that the detainee would plead guilty.

"Hearing all the evidence," Mr. Bush?

The Military Commissions Act specifically permits the introduction of classified evidence not made available to the defense.

Your words are lies, Sir.

They are lies that imperil us all.

"One of the terrorists believed to have planned the 9/11 attacks," you told us yesterday, "said he hoped the attacks would be the beginning of the end of America."

That terrorist, sir, could only hope.

Not his actions, nor the actions of a ceaseless line of terrorists (real or imagined), could measure up to what you have wrought.

Habeas corpus? Gone.

The Geneva Conventions? Optional.

The moral force we shined outwards to the world as an eternal beacon, and inwards at ourselves as an eternal protection? Snuffed out.

These things you have done, Mr. Bush, they would be "the beginning of the end of America."

And did it even occur to you once, sir -- somewhere in amidst those eight separate, gruesome, intentional, terroristic invocations of the horrors of 9/11 -- that with only a little further shift in this world we now know--just a touch more repudiation of all of that for which our patriots died --- did it ever occur to you once that in just 27 months and two days from now when you leave office, some irresponsible future president and a "competent tribunal" of lackeys would be entitled, by the actions of your own hand, to declare the status of "unlawful enemy combatant" for -- and convene a Military Commission to try -- not John Walker Lindh, but George Walker Bush?

For the most vital, the most urgent, the most inescapable of reasons.

And doubtless, Sir, all of them--as always--wrong.
Tags:

From: [identity profile] fjm.livejournal.com


For the record: Roosevelt opposed the internment of Japanese but gave in, in order to push through other policies. Not pretty, but it's not right to see him as the instigator.

From: [identity profile] renegade500.livejournal.com


Unfortunately, with laws like No Child Left Behind, which is forcing a dumbing down effect in public education, most young people are not getting the full force of the history behind this. And I'm not convinced they're getting it in post-secondary education. That to me is a huge part of the problem: if we cannot see that we are repeating mistakes of the past (and how bad those mistakes were), then where is the harm in letting Bush and his cronies do what they're doing? I get sick of the tired "I have nothing to hide" excuse I hear from people who think it is perfectly acceptable to let our government errode away our civil liberties, because after all, they're only going after the bad guys (I'm sure I'm preaching to the choir).

Olbermann at least is able to speak out to a much larger audience than I ever could. But then again, those very people who really need to hear it are more likely to be over hanging out with Bill O'Reilly.

From: [identity profile] mckitterick.livejournal.com


Y'know, a conspiracty theorist could see No Child Left Behind as part of an overall plan to whitewash our history, thereby making an Orwellian omni-pan-opticon America possible. Too bad their "Eternal Republican Empire" fell through last Novemeber.

From: [identity profile] gmskarka.livejournal.com


I come from a family of educators. It has been a topic of conversation at family gatherings for as long as I can remember that there has been a concerted effort to "dumb down" the American public since the early 1970s -- a time when an educated populace was nearly successful in pulling off a successful revolution. An educated populace was instrumental in bringing Vietnam to an end, and, by understanding and being able to draw conclusions from an independent Fourth Estate, bringing down a corrupt President.

The powers-that-be must have been scared to death. Since then, standards in American education have been dropped across the board. Can't have the consumers rocking the boat, ya know.

From: [identity profile] mckitterick.livejournal.com


I want to not believe this is the case, that our own government would not only be complicit in such a thing, but actively pursuing a dumbing-down of our citizenry. That'll backfire pretty damned soon when the new consumers can't afford to buy anything that the wealthy are producing.

From: [identity profile] chernobylred.livejournal.com


What makes you think smarts have got anything whatsoever to do with purchasing power?

From: [identity profile] mckitterick.livejournal.com


Those without an education are forced to work in the service industry. The less they have, the lower the wages. These days, unless you work for a union shop (and have an "in" there), it takes a college degree just to get a half-way decent job.

From: [identity profile] chernobylred.livejournal.com


Those without an education are forced to work in the service industry

Isn't that what Mexicans are for? Seriously. Did you hear Bush's speech from last week? Telling people that we need immigrant workers to "do jobs that Americans won't do." Unless NPR has adopted the habit of fabricating sound bites, that's a direct quote.

Honestly, I don't think the idiots in charge really care. They'll promote inside the good-old-boy network, regardless of intelligence or competency. This administration has proved that beyond all doubt. Perhaps they figure their company (i.e. our government) is being run by total morons, surely the rest of the country's companies will be fine being run by morons.

Anyway, my point was: A brief look at those in charge today is sad proof that you don't need to be smart to have money and power.

From: [identity profile] chernobylred.livejournal.com


For the record, I should probably say that this:

Those without an education are forced to work in the service industry

Isn't that what Mexicans are for?


Was sarcasm.
.

Most Popular Tags

Powered by Dreamwidth Studios

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags