How will Humankind will meet its end? And a poll!

[mckitterick]

I'm in the midst of planning for my spring "Science, Technology, & Society: Examining the Future Through a Science Fiction Lens" course, and was researching a bit for interesting material. Here's some of what I found.

Are you the very model of a singularitarian?

Speaking of transcendental or catastrophic change, this book on Armageddon Science looks interesting. Here's an interesting interview with the author, discussing various end-of-humankind scenarios.

[Poll #1659680]
Later: How do we avoid such scenarios?

In related news, have you seen the Google Ngram Viewer? Interesting tool for seeing word usage in the books that Google has scanned. Note how "natural philosophy" reaches peak usage in the early 1800s, while "fuck" saw its peak usage from the late 1600s to the early 1700s, appearing almost not at all from the early 1800s through the 1960 or so. "Extinction" doesn't see much regular use until the late 1700s, becoming more popular ever since. What can we learn from these trends? Just sayin'.

Singularitarianly yours,
Chris

Comments

[bogwitch64.livejournal.com]

I'm eternally optimistic, and if you try to pop my bubble, I'll stick my fingers in my ears and sing, "lalalalalalaaaaa!"

;)

[scarypudding.livejournal.com]

I am not a filker by nature, but somebody needs to put on that Gilbert & Sullivan number, perhaps on the occasion of Vernor Vinge's next book release.

[ms-danson.livejournal.com]

Later: How do we avoid such scenarios?

Evolve?

[chernobylred.livejournal.com]

Video guy is adorable. I'd like to ask him about the line "while we destroy all of the useless information that remains," though. Especially after he said the bit about any loss being a tragedy. Maybe that was his attempt at showing the contradictory nature of being human. =D

[roya-spirit.livejournal.com]

One other, that of the Conspiracy/New World Order Theorists:

Decimation of the overall population by poor food, lab-created disease and incarceration for the purpose of labor.

Those that remain will eventually be annihilated by our Benevolent Feline Overlords returning to find what a sad state has been made of their initial experiments on human evolution. They are going to be really pissed off about having to start all over again.

[kimberlywade.livejournal.com]

I orginally marked slow extinction then switched to other, because i think the total destruction of civilization as we know it will happen rapidly due to causes mentioned, but a few small bands of humans will surely survive to die out slowly as the earth changes. They may survive long enough to create new civilizations and see them decline. It's all cyclical.

random commenter

[rowanda380.livejournal.com]

really? I am the only one who went for natural virus, surprising, oh well, I guess that wouldn't mean the whole extinction... just maybe 2/3rds gone...I change my vote, I go to asteroid.

[queenmomcat.livejournal.com]

specifically shortage due to overpopulation/overuse. Plausibly also some existing technology coming back to bite us in the butt (e.g. Bhopal or Chernobyl)

[siro-gravity.livejournal.com]

I think it's unavoidable, Chris. Because by the time fear of extinction outweighs greed, it will be too late.

So.
I do what I can in my own life. And hope that there are enough people doing this that it actually makes a difference.

By the way, I never got my copy of Transcendence. :(