In my most recent "Astro-image of the day" post about Mars, I used a 600-pixel-wide image instead of 500, as I've used for months. This makes a larger, prettier image, but might mess up people's LJ Friends view. On the other hand, people might like even bigger images! So a poll:
[Poll #1101676]
To help you decide on your favorite image width, below are a variety of examples of this same image in different sizes.

500 pixels (my usual size for these posts):


600 pixels (the size I used today):


800 pixels:


1000 pixels:


Images courtesy of NASA.

Thanks for your feedback!
Chris

From: [identity profile] countrycousin.livejournal.com


I have no opinion on the size, but vote for the LJ-cut, not because I don't want to see them, but because, as I wrote earlier, I have engaged a LJ setup option that tokenizes large pictures in my Friends view. This, however, disables the convenient links you place in your pictures. If you use a cut, the pictures appear in all their glory and the link is usable - if, of course, I click on the cut.

So - unless really pressed, or my net connection is temporarily glacial, I look at what you kindly offer us. But a cut would be convenient.
.

Most Popular Tags

Powered by Dreamwidth Studios

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags