This is interesting: a pill which eliminates the period while the woman takes it over a 4-month-duration. Imagine, only having a period every 4 months...
http://www.cnn.com/2003/HEALTH/09/04/new.birth.control/
Chris
http://www.cnn.com/2003/HEALTH/09/04/new.birth.control/
Chris
From:
no subject
Lots of women "in the know" have been doing this for years, by just skipping the sugar pills every month and starting a new package.
From:
no subject
Chris
From:
no subject
Granted, lots of women have problems, but in the overall picture, I'm one of the happy-with-my-normal-cycles types, even after having the tubal ligation years ago.
Think of it in this way:
How about a pill that eliminates that messy ejaculation that men have? I mean, if there's no reason to be pregnant, why would we need it?
From:
no subject
Chris
From:
no subject
As Misia said, there's something wrong with the whole picture.
Painful and irregular periods are often caused by some sort of drug or chemical that was induced into the body, and that's just not fair for the women who suffer it.
From:
no subject
...and yet apparently this isn't true for women who normally have a period every month, so it's somehow magically okay for them to only menstruate 3x a year?
I don't buy it -- either way. I think someone's being lied to in the name of pharmaceutical profit, and I think it's women as a collective class.
From: (Anonymous)
amen
Trent